In Silico Drug Discovery — Nuclyra
Loading Nuclyra…
Service · DIS

In Silico Drug Discovery

Molecular modeling, docking, virtual screening, and computational chemistry to accelerate early-stage target validation and candidate evaluation.

Who this is for

TYPICAL CLIENT

A discovery-stage biotech trying to shorten the path from target to candidate

Usually a Head of Computational Chemistry or VP of Discovery who needs to prioritize a chemical space that’s too large to test by hand, and wants modeling that holds up when it meets a wet-lab assay, not just a leaderboard.

What you walk away with

Six concrete deliverables, not a slide deck.

This is exactly what transfers to you at the end of this In Silico Drug Discovery engagement.

Target structural analysis report

Binding-site characterization and druggability assessment for your target.

Virtual screening results, ranked

Full compound library screening results with binding affinity scores and confidence intervals.

Generative candidate set

Novel candidate structures with predicted properties, ready for medicinal chemistry review.

ADMET prediction report

Developability scoring across absorption, metabolism, toxicity and related properties.

Annotated shortlist

A prioritized shortlist with reasoning for each candidate’s inclusion, in a format your team already uses.

Reproducible screening pipeline

The full screening and scoring pipeline, so future campaigns don’t start from zero.

What's included

What this service includes

Virtual screening & docking

Structure-based screening across libraries of millions of compounds, ranked by predicted binding affinity.

Generative molecule design

Property-guided generative models propose novel candidates optimized for potency, selectivity and synthesizability.

ADMET prediction

Early-stage prediction of absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion and toxicity to deprioritize weak candidates fast.

Target identification support

Structural biology and omics data combined to support early target identification and validation.

In practice

What this looks like in a real engagement

Three concrete examples of the kind of work this service covers.

Virtual screening a compound library against a target

Docking and scoring a large library computationally to prioritize the few hundred compounds actually worth synthesizing.

Generative design around a known scaffold

Proposing novel candidate molecules with predicted binding affinity and drug-like properties around a validated starting point.

ADMET prediction before wet-lab testing

Flagging likely toxicity, solubility or metabolism issues early, so wet-lab time is spent on candidates more likely to survive it.

Why it matters

Narrowing the search space before the wet lab gets involved.

Synthesizing and testing a candidate is expensive and slow. Our job is to make sure the candidates that reach the bench are the ones worth testing — not the ones that happened to come first.

We combine the principles of physics, chemistry, and biology with advanced AI to understand molecules beyond a single prediction. From molecular interactions and chemical properties to biological activity and developability, our models connect the full discovery picture to identify stronger, more actionable candidates.

In silico drug discovery workflow from target identification through virtual screening, molecular docking, ADMET prediction and lead optimization
How we deliver it

How an engagement runs

Four stages, from initial scope to delivery.

Stage 01 — Target

Characterize the target

Structural and binding-site analysis establishes what a viable candidate needs to satisfy.

Stage 02 — Screen

Screen & generate

Virtual libraries are screened alongside generative design runs to widen and rank the candidate pool.

Stage 03 — Predict

Predict developability

ADMET and selectivity prediction filters candidates before synthesis is ever considered.

Stage 04 — Shortlist

Deliver a ranked shortlist

A prioritized, annotated shortlist is handed to your medicinal chemistry team.

Tooling

What we build it with

RDKitAutoDock VinaSchrödinger SuiteOpenEyePyTorch GeometricDeepChemAlphaFoldChemAxon
Nuclyra’s shortlist matched what took our team three months to narrow down manually — in under two weeks.
Questions we get

Before you reach out

Yes, fully. Generated candidates, screening results and the pipeline itself all transfer to you.

We regularly screen libraries in the 1M–50M compound range; larger campaigns are scoped case by case based on target and compute budget.

Yes, we can work from a predicted structure (e.g., AlphaFold) when a crystal structure isn’t available, with appropriate caveats on confidence.

Let’s talk

Have a target and a compound library?

Tell us about the target class and library size — we’ll scope a screening and design campaign.